Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEClio VS Intapp_
As of 4 November 2026, Intapp is named by 115 companies and Clio by 142; Clio skews to companies under 200 people (73% vs 12%), Intapp to companies over 1,000 (53% vs 6%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Clio's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Intapp rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Clio: 2–200 employees
- 73%
- Intapp: 2–200 employees
- 12%
- Clio: 1,000+ employees
- 6%
- Intapp: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.9 · 11.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 249 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Clio | share | Intapp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 10 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 23 | 16% | 2 | 2% | Clio |
| 11-50 employees | 44 | 31% | 5 | 4% | Clio |
| 51-200 employees | 37 | 26% | 7 | 6% | Clio |
| 201-500 employees | 10 | 7% | 18 | 16% | Intapp |
| 501-1000 employees | 10 | 7% | 22 | 19% | Intapp |
| 1001-5000 employees | 5 | 4% | 52 | 45% | Intapp |
| 5001-10000 employees | 1 | 1% | 9 | 8% | Intapp |
| 10,001+ employees | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Clio | share | Intapp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 91 | 64% | 109 | 95% | Intapp |
| Technology & software | 21 | 15% | 3 | 3% | Clio |
| Public, community & associations | 14 | 10% | 3 | 3% | Clio |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Clio | share | Intapp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 123 | 87% | 81 | 70% | Clio |
| Canada | 10 | 7% | 3 | 3% | Clio |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% | 19 | 17% | Intapp |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| PH | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| HK | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Clio | share | Intapp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal, compliance & risk | 361 | 54% | 1,166 | 84% | Intapp |
| Finance & accounting | 54 | 8% | 6 | 0% | Clio |
| Administration & office | 42 | 6% | 37 | 3% | Clio |
| Sales | 24 | 4% | 8 | 1% | Clio |
| Product, program & project management | 18 | 3% | 8 | 1% | Clio |
| Software engineering | 18 | 3% | 4 | 0% | Clio |
| social care and community | 15 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 14 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 7 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 5 | 1% | 11 | 1% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 4 | 1% | 39 | 3% | Intapp |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare support and caregiving | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Travel, leisure & events | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Clio →
Companies using Intapp →
legal practice management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Intapp is named by 115 companies in job postings and Clio by 142; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/clio-vs-intapp)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Clio vs Intapp: questions
Which is more used, Clio or Intapp?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Clio (142) over Intapp (115). By website-and-DNS footprint, Clio (249 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Clio?
73% of Clio companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 12% for Intapp. 6% of Clio companies have over 1,000 employees, against 53% for Intapp.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Clio in marketing and Intapp in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Clio or Intapp, and get 1,000 records free.