Start free
Tools · Category

legal practice management, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, iManage leads legal practice management with 254 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Thomson Reuters Elite at 185.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
iManage · 254
Runner-up
Thomson Reuters Elite · 185
Most hiring, 90 days
iManage
Highest postings per company
Intapp Open
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
1,811companies across the category
14%of them on iManage
11,288postings naming a legal practice management in 90 days
30tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every legal practice management we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
iManageiManage
254
2,2588.9
2
Thomson Reuters EliteThomson Reuters
185
6453.5
3
ClioClio
142
5493.9
4
AderantAderant
127
1,1308.9
5
IntappIntapp
115
1,29611.3
6
NetDocumentsNetDocuments
101
2502.5
7
Elite 3EThomson Reuters
94
1,14912.2
8
Thomson Reuters Legal TrackerThomson Reuters
91
3023.3
9
FilevineFilevine
67
3284.9
10
LitifyLitify
59
1572.7
11
CM/ECFUS Federal Courts
46
1102.4
12
LiteraLitera
45
972.2
13
Aderant ExpertAderant
41
2175.3
14
Intapp OpenIntapp
40
93123.3
15
CounselLinkLexisNexis
37
1494.0
16
BigHandBigHand
33
882.7
17
CompuLawWolters Kluwer
31
35211.4
18
MyCaseMyCase
31
983.2
19
ProLawThomson Reuters
30
581.9
20
AnaquaAnaqua
29
652.2
21
NYSCEFNew York State Unified Court System
28
2408.6
22
LegalServerLegalServer
27
572.1
23
HighQThomson Reuters
26
903.5
24
TymetrixWolters Kluwer
26
1806.9
25
ProclaimEclipse Legal
22
693.1
26
SerengetiSerengeti Law
22
341.5
27
CourtAlertCourtAlert
19
28014.7
28
Intapp TimeIntapp
18
321.8
29
MilanaMilana
15
533.5
30
LEXolution.DMSLEXolution
10
242.4
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

iManage vs Thomson Reuters Elite254 · 185iManage vs Clio254 · 142iManage vs Aderant254 · 127iManage vs Intapp254 · 115iManage vs NetDocuments254 · 101Thomson Reuters Elite vs Clio185 · 142Thomson Reuters Elite vs Aderant185 · 127Thomson Reuters Elite vs Intapp185 · 115Thomson Reuters Elite vs NetDocuments185 · 101Clio vs Aderant142 · 127Clio vs Intapp142 · 115Clio vs NetDocuments142 · 101Aderant vs Intapp127 · 115Aderant vs NetDocuments127 · 101Intapp vs NetDocuments115 · 101
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

iManage leads legal practice management with 254 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Thomson Reuters Elite at 185. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/legal-practice-management)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

legal practice management: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free