Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEDuckDB VS Google BigQuery_
As of 30 October 2026, Google BigQuery is named by 2,715 companies and DuckDB by 135; DuckDB skews to companies under 200 people (57% vs 48%), Google BigQuery to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: DuckDB's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google BigQuery rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- DuckDB: 2–200 employees
- 57%
- Google BigQuery: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- DuckDB: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Google BigQuery: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.8 · 3.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | DuckDB | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 42 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 23 | 17% | 218 | 8% | DuckDB |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 18% | 439 | 16% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 30 | 22% | 651 | 24% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 17 | 13% | 393 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 14 | 10% | 257 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 15 | 11% | 361 | 13% | Google BigQuery |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 1% | 102 | 4% | Google BigQuery |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 7% | 252 | 9% | Google BigQuery |
| Segment | DuckDB | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 79 | 59% | 1,279 | 47% | DuckDB |
| Business & finance services | 21 | 16% | 582 | 21% | Google BigQuery |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 6% | 45 | 2% | DuckDB |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 5% | 79 | 3% | DuckDB |
| Manufacturing & industry | 6 | 4% | 157 | 6% | even |
| Health care | 4 | 3% | 60 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 3% | 62 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 163 | 6% | Google BigQuery |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 145 | 5% | Google BigQuery |
| Property & construction | – | – | 42 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 40 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 35 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | DuckDB | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 93 | 69% | 1,633 | 60% | DuckDB |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 10% | 240 | 9% | even |
| Germany | 8 | 6% | 114 | 4% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 111 | 4% | Google BigQuery |
| India | 2 | 1% | 59 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | 43 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | 30 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 42 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | 50 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 52 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | – | – | 43 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 38 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | DuckDB | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 167 | 51% | 5,837 | 53% | Google BigQuery |
| Software engineering | 114 | 35% | 1,678 | 15% | DuckDB |
| IT operations & business systems | 5 | 2% | 610 | 6% | Google BigQuery |
| Sales | 3 | 1% | 294 | 3% | even |
| construction and civil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 74 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | 87 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | 175 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 258 | 2% | Google BigQuery |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 389 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 134 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 45 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 44 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using DuckDB →
Companies using Google BigQuery →
data warehouses olap ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Google BigQuery is named by 2,715 companies in job postings and DuckDB by 135; 33 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/duckdb-vs-google-bigquery)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
DuckDB vs Google BigQuery: questions
Which is more used, DuckDB or Google BigQuery?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google BigQuery (2,715) over DuckDB (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google BigQuery (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses DuckDB?
57% of DuckDB companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 48% for Google BigQuery. 19% of DuckDB companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for Google BigQuery.
Do companies run both?
33 companies name both in their postings, usually DuckDB in marketing and Google BigQuery in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on DuckDB or Google BigQuery, and get 1,000 records free.