Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEJTAG VS National Instruments_
As of 4 November 2026, National Instruments is named by 268 companies and JTAG by 652; JTAG skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 34%), National Instruments to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 31%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: JTAG's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, National Instruments rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- JTAG: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- National Instruments: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- JTAG: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- National Instruments: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | JTAG | share | National Instruments | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 11 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 93 | 14% | 23 | 9% | JTAG |
| 11-50 employees | 95 | 15% | 25 | 9% | JTAG |
| 51-200 employees | 133 | 20% | 44 | 16% | JTAG |
| 201-500 employees | 81 | 12% | 39 | 15% | National Instruments |
| 501-1000 employees | 40 | 6% | 15 | 6% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 73 | 11% | 41 | 15% | National Instruments |
| 5001-10000 employees | 27 | 4% | 17 | 6% | National Instruments |
| 10,001+ employees | 99 | 15% | 59 | 22% | National Instruments |
| Segment | JTAG | share | National Instruments | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 352 | 54% | 140 | 52% | even |
| Technology & software | 156 | 24% | 26 | 10% | JTAG |
| Business & finance services | 53 | 8% | 29 | 11% | National Instruments |
| Automotive | 22 | 3% | 24 | 9% | National Instruments |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 22 | 3% | 10 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 14 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 6 | 1% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 1% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | JTAG | share | National Instruments | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 433 | 66% | 178 | 66% | even |
| United Kingdom | 35 | 5% | 14 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 32 | 5% | 15 | 6% | even |
| India | 19 | 3% | 11 | 4% | even |
| France | 18 | 3% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 13 | 2% | 10 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 8 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 6 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Japan | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | JTAG | share | National Instruments | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,256 | 44% | 171 | 19% | JTAG |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,024 | 36% | 564 | 63% | National Instruments |
| IT operations & business systems | 127 | 4% | 2 | 0% | JTAG |
| Quality, safety & environment | 21 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 16 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 15 | 1% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 11 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 7 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 6 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 5 | 0% | 12 | 1% | even |
| research and science | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using JTAG →
Companies using National Instruments →
test measurement ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
National Instruments is named by 268 companies in job postings and JTAG by 652; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/jtag-vs-national-instruments)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
JTAG vs National Instruments: questions
Which is more used, JTAG or National Instruments?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, JTAG (652) over National Instruments (268). By website-and-DNS footprint, National Instruments (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses JTAG?
49% of JTAG companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for National Instruments. 31% of JTAG companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for National Instruments.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually JTAG in marketing and National Instruments in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on JTAG or National Instruments, and get 1,000 records free.