Start free
Tools · Category

test measurement, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, LabVIEW leads test measurement with 1,282 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of JTAG at 652.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
LabVIEW · 1,282
Runner-up
JTAG · 652
Most hiring, 90 days
LabVIEW
Highest postings per company
Teradyne
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
6,450companies across the category
20%of them on LabVIEW
20,304postings naming a test measurement in 90 days
40tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every test measurement we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
LabVIEWNI
1,282
4,4093.4
2
JTAGIEEE
652
2,1733.3
3
KeyenceKeyence
384
8592.2
4
ZEISS CALYPSOCarl Zeiss
314
8052.6
5
PC-DMISHexagon
283
4791.7
6
National InstrumentsEmerson
268
7292.7
7
NI TestStandNI (Emerson)
244
8023.3
8
Vector CANoeVector Informatik
234
1,0494.5
9
FlukeFortive
189
5262.8
10
CANalyzerVector Informatik
180
9275.2
11
PolyWorksInnovMetric
169
2851.7
12
MeggerMegger
155
4002.6
13
dSPACEdSPACE
149
3922.6
14
KeysightKeysight Technologies
148
6074.1
15
SCPIIEEE
124
2181.8
16
OMICRON test systemsOMICRON
110
4534.1
17
Rohde & SchwarzRohde & Schwarz
109
2182.0
18
ETAS INCAETAS
101
4864.8
19
GPIBIEEE
99
1952.0
20
DobleDoble Engineering
95
4815.1
21
CANapeVector Informatik
93
3924.2
22
PXIPXI Systems Alliance
84
2062.5
23
CAPLVector Informatik
77
2293.0
24
IxiaKeysight
75
3114.1
25
InstronIllinois Tool Works
74
1311.8
26
SpirentSpirent Communications
71
2683.8
27
RenishawRenishaw
69
1792.6
28
Audio PrecisionAudio Precision
63
1933.1
29
TeradyneTeradyne
59
5589.5
30
ETASBosch
58
2003.4
31
DewesoftDewesoft
52
961.8
32
Zeiss CMMZeiss
50
691.4
33
Advantest ATEAdvantest
45
2184.8
34
VerisurfVerisurf
44
1032.3
35
VeriStandNational Instruments
43
771.8
36
Advantest V93000Advantest
42
2285.4
37
AnritsuAnritsu
42
972.3
38
EXFOEXFO
40
822.0
39
NI CompactRIONI
40
591.5
40
USRPEttus Research (NI)
40
1152.9
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

LabVIEW vs JTAG1,282 · 652LabVIEW vs Keyence1,282 · 384LabVIEW vs ZEISS CALYPSO1,282 · 314LabVIEW vs PC-DMIS1,282 · 283LabVIEW vs National Instruments1,282 · 268JTAG vs Keyence652 · 384JTAG vs ZEISS CALYPSO652 · 314JTAG vs PC-DMIS652 · 283JTAG vs National Instruments652 · 268Keyence vs ZEISS CALYPSO384 · 314Keyence vs PC-DMIS384 · 283Keyence vs National Instruments384 · 268ZEISS CALYPSO vs PC-DMIS314 · 283ZEISS CALYPSO vs National Instruments314 · 268PC-DMIS vs National Instruments283 · 268
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

LabVIEW leads test measurement with 1,282 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of JTAG at 652. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/test-measurement)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

test measurement: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free