Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DELabVIEW VS ZEISS CALYPSO_
As of 4 November 2026, ZEISS CALYPSO is named by 314 companies and LabVIEW by 1,282; LabVIEW skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 32%), ZEISS CALYPSO to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 39%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: LabVIEW's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ZEISS CALYPSO rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- LabVIEW: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- ZEISS CALYPSO: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- LabVIEW: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- ZEISS CALYPSO: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.4 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | LabVIEW | share | ZEISS CALYPSO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 15 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 92 | 7% | 16 | 5% | LabVIEW |
| 11-50 employees | 178 | 14% | 28 | 9% | LabVIEW |
| 51-200 employees | 227 | 18% | 58 | 18% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 166 | 13% | 42 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 103 | 8% | 24 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 212 | 17% | 70 | 22% | ZEISS CALYPSO |
| 5001-10000 employees | 86 | 7% | 20 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 203 | 16% | 51 | 16% | even |
| Segment | LabVIEW | share | ZEISS CALYPSO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 708 | 55% | 172 | 55% | even |
| Business & finance services | 148 | 12% | 71 | 23% | ZEISS CALYPSO |
| Technology & software | 102 | 8% | 23 | 7% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 64 | 5% | 6 | 2% | LabVIEW |
| Automotive | 57 | 4% | 18 | 6% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 55 | 4% | 2 | 1% | LabVIEW |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 52 | 4% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 26 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 24 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 16 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 15 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 12 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Segment | LabVIEW | share | ZEISS CALYPSO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 838 | 65% | 183 | 58% | LabVIEW |
| Germany | 110 | 9% | 42 | 13% | ZEISS CALYPSO |
| United Kingdom | 61 | 5% | 13 | 4% | even |
| France | 41 | 3% | 15 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 26 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| India | 20 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 14 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 13 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 12 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LabVIEW | share | ZEISS CALYPSO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 3,625 | 66% | 5 | 0% | LabVIEW |
| Software engineering | 583 | 11% | 122 | 12% | even |
| research and science | 135 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 118 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 69 | 1% | 277 | 28% | ZEISS CALYPSO |
| Sales | 68 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 52 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 42 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 24 | 0% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 22 | 0% | 18 | 2% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 22 | 0% | 126 | 13% | ZEISS CALYPSO |
| Education & training | 21 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 16 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| personal care and wellness | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | 1 | 0% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 22 | 2% | ZEISS CALYPSO |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 65 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using LabVIEW →
Companies using ZEISS CALYPSO →
test measurement ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
ZEISS CALYPSO is named by 314 companies in job postings and LabVIEW by 1,282; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/labview-vs-zeiss-calypso)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
LabVIEW vs ZEISS CALYPSO: questions
Which is more used, LabVIEW or ZEISS CALYPSO?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, LabVIEW (1,282) over ZEISS CALYPSO (314). By website-and-DNS footprint, ZEISS CALYPSO (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses LabVIEW?
39% of LabVIEW companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for ZEISS CALYPSO. 39% of LabVIEW companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for ZEISS CALYPSO.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually LabVIEW in marketing and ZEISS CALYPSO in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on LabVIEW or ZEISS CALYPSO, and get 1,000 records free.