Compare · test measurement

PC-DMIS VS ZEISS CALYPSO_

As of 4 November 2026, ZEISS CALYPSO is named by 314 companies and PC-DMIS by 283; PC-DMIS skews to companies under 200 people (34% vs 32%), ZEISS CALYPSO to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 38%).

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: PC-DMIS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ZEISS CALYPSO rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

PC-DMIS: 2–200 employees
34%
ZEISS CALYPSO: 2–200 employees
32%
PC-DMIS: 1,000+ employees
38%
ZEISS CALYPSO: 1,000+ employees
45%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.7 · 2.6
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
283companies name PC-DMIS
314companies name ZEISS CALYPSO
126name both
479 · 805postings in 90 days, PC-DMIS · ZEISS CALYPSO
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentPC-DMISshareZEISS CALYPSOshareLeans
Self-employed31%52%even
2-10 employees124%165%even
11-50 employees217%289%even
51-200 employees6423%5818%PC-DMIS
201-500 employees5519%4213%PC-DMIS
501-1000 employees207%248%even
1001-5000 employees5820%7022%even
5001-10000 employees155%206%even
10,001+ employees3512%5116%ZEISS CALYPSO
By industry
SegmentPC-DMISshareZEISS CALYPSOshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry21074%17255%PC-DMIS
Automotive269%186%PC-DMIS
Business & finance services155%7123%ZEISS CALYPSO
Utilities & infrastructure83%72%even
Commerce & trade62%41%even
Technology & software62%237%ZEISS CALYPSO
Media & content41%41%even
Consumer services & leisure31%21%even
Property & construction21%21%even
Public, community & associations10%62%even
Health care10%31%even
Transport, logistics & rental10%21%even
By country
SegmentPC-DMISshareZEISS CALYPSOshareLeans
United States21676%18358%PC-DMIS
Germany176%4213%ZEISS CALYPSO
Canada114%93%even
France52%155%ZEISS CALYPSO
United Kingdom41%134%ZEISS CALYPSO
Switzerland31%41%even
Spain31%31%even
Czechia21%––outside top 12
Poland21%41%even
Sweden21%31%even
United Arab Emirates10%21%even
Australia10%72%even
Austria––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentPC-DMISshareZEISS CALYPSOshareLeans
Quality, safety & environment34860%27728%PC-DMIS
manufacturing and production193%141%even
Engineering (non-software)92%50%even
Sales51%81%even
Finance & accounting31%656%ZEISS CALYPSO
Software engineering20%12212%ZEISS CALYPSO
construction and civil10%––outside top 12
logistics warehouse and transport10%––outside top 12
skilled trades and field service10%61%even
IT operations & business systems––12613%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––222%outside top 12
Data & AI––182%outside top 12
Product, program & project management––172%outside top 12
General management & consulting––121%outside top 12
healthcare clinical––111%outside top 12
hospitality and food service––20%outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Customer service & success––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

ZEISS CALYPSO is named by 314 companies in job postings and PC-DMIS by 283; 126 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/pc-dmis-vs-zeiss-calypso)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

PC-DMIS vs ZEISS CALYPSO: questions

Which is more used, PC-DMIS or ZEISS CALYPSO?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, ZEISS CALYPSO (314) over PC-DMIS (283). By website-and-DNS footprint, ZEISS CALYPSO (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses PC-DMIS?

34% of PC-DMIS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for ZEISS CALYPSO. 38% of PC-DMIS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for ZEISS CALYPSO.

Do companies run both?

126 companies name both in their postings, usually PC-DMIS in marketing and ZEISS CALYPSO in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on PC-DMIS or ZEISS CALYPSO, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free