Start free
Tools · message brokers streaming · Alternatives

Apache Pulsar alternatives_

As of 4 November 2026, 39 message brokers streaming are named by companies instead of Apache Pulsar: Apache Kafka by 6,262 companies, RabbitMQ by 2,560, Amazon SQS by 1,798.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Apache Pulsar, companies in postings
169
Most used alternative
Apache Kafka · 6,262
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Apache Kafka
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01 — Ranked by evidence

message brokers streaming companies choose instead of Apache Pulsar

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Apache Pulsarpostings, 90 dCompare
1
Apache KafkaApache Software Foundation
6,2623705%25,230Apache Pulsar vs Apache Kafka →
2
RabbitMQBroadcom
2,5601515%6,200Apache Pulsar vs RabbitMQ →
3
Amazon SQSAmazon Web Services
1,7981064%3,909Apache Pulsar vs Amazon SQS →
4
Azure Service BusMicrosoft
1,064630%3,042Apache Pulsar vs Azure Service Bus →
5
Amazon SNSAmazon
1,041616%2,339Apache Pulsar vs Amazon SNS →
6
Amazon KinesisAmazon
961569%2,185Apache Pulsar vs Amazon Kinesis →
7
Google Cloud Pub/SubGoogle
912540%2,446Apache Pulsar vs Google Cloud Pub/Sub →
8
IBM MQIBM
680402%2,550Apache Pulsar vs IBM MQ →
9
Java Message ServiceEclipse Foundation
602356%1,455Apache Pulsar vs Java Message Service →
10
Amazon EventBridgeAmazon Web Services
543321%1,242Apache Pulsar vs Amazon EventBridge →
11
Azure Event HubsMicrosoft
525311%1,243Apache Pulsar vs Azure Event Hubs →
12
CeleryCelery
473280%862Apache Pulsar vs Celery →
13
Apache ActiveMQApache Software Foundation
343203%704Apache Pulsar vs Apache ActiveMQ →
14
Amazon MSKAmazon Web Services
331196%812Apache Pulsar vs Amazon MSK →
15
NATSSynadia
267158%523Apache Pulsar vs NATS →
16
Azure Event GridMicrosoft
262155%676Apache Pulsar vs Azure Event Grid →
17
AMQPOASIS
15994%350Apache Pulsar vs AMQP →
18
ConfluentConfluent
14485%529Apache Pulsar vs Confluent →
19
SidekiqContributed Systems
12976%195soon
20
SAP Event MeshSAP
11266%366soon
21
BullMQTaskforce.sh
10562%122soon
22
ZeroMQZeroMQ community
10059%190soon
23
Confluent Schema RegistryConfluent
9254%205soon
24
RedpandaRedpanda Data
8852%304soon
25
SolaceSolace
8349%643soon
26
Apache ActiveMQ ArtemisApache Software Foundation
7444%197soon
27
Microsoft Message QueuingMicrosoft
4325%88soon
28
MassTransitMassTransit
4024%75soon
29
NATS JetStreamSynadia
4024%95soon
30
Confluent CloudConfluent
3722%73soon
31
Google Cloud TasksGoogle
3018%52soon
32
AMPS60East Technologies
2817%82soon
33
Confluent PlatformConfluent
2716%82soon
34
TIBCO RendezvousTIBCO
2716%76soon
35
AeronReal Logic
2515%114soon
36
TIBCO EMSTIBCO
2414%118soon
37
Amazon MQAmazon
2112%42soon
38
HiveMQHiveMQ
1811%45soon
39
SAP Advanced Event MeshSAP
1811%55soon
20,257 companies name a message brokers streaming in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Apache Pulsar users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 message brokers streaming are named by companies instead of Apache Pulsar: Apache Kafka by 6,262 companies, RabbitMQ by 2,560, Amazon SQS by 1,798, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/apache-pulsar/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Apache Pulsar alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Apache Pulsar?

Apache Kafka: 6,262 companies name it in their own job postings, against 169 for Apache Pulsar.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on Apache Pulsar
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free