AWS CodeBuild alternatives
As of 5 November 2026, 39 ci cd are named by companies instead of AWS CodeBuild: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, GitLab CI/CD by 3,638.
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- AWS CodeBuild, companies in postings
- 174
- Most used alternative
- Jenkins · 6,457
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Jenkins
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
ci cd companies choose instead of AWS CodeBuild
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs AWS CodeBuild | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JenkinsContinuous Delivery Foundation | 6,457 | 3711% | 27,488 | AWS CodeBuild vs Jenkins → | |
| 2 | GitHub ActionsMicrosoft | 6,089 | 3499% | 16,950 | AWS CodeBuild vs GitHub Actions → | |
| 3 | GitLab CI/CDGitLab | 3,638 | 2091% | 11,525 | AWS CodeBuild vs GitLab CI/CD → | |
| 4 | Argo CDCloud Native Computing Foundation | 2,387 | 1372% | 5,952 | AWS CodeBuild vs Argo CD → | |
| 5 | CircleCICircleCI | 671 | 386% | 1,263 | AWS CodeBuild vs CircleCI → | |
| 6 | Azure PipelinesMicrosoft | 549 | 316% | 1,155 | AWS CodeBuild vs Azure Pipelines → | |
| 7 | Atlassian BambooAtlassian | 521 | 299% | 1,297 | AWS CodeBuild vs Atlassian Bamboo → | |
| 8 | TeamCityJetBrains | 379 | 218% | 1,166 | AWS CodeBuild vs TeamCity → | |
| 9 | AWS CodePipelineAmazon Web Services | 365 | 210% | 668 | AWS CodeBuild vs AWS CodePipeline → | |
| 10 | fastlanefastlane | 267 | 153% | 554 | AWS CodeBuild vs fastlane → | |
| 11 | CopadoCopado | 266 | 153% | 660 | AWS CodeBuild vs Copado → | |
| 12 | Salesforce DXSalesforce | 260 | 149% | 516 | AWS CodeBuild vs Salesforce DX → | |
| 13 | HarnessHarness | 226 | 130% | 1,082 | AWS CodeBuild vs Harness → | |
| 14 | GearsetGearset | 214 | 123% | 399 | AWS CodeBuild vs Gearset → | |
| 15 | Google Cloud BuildGoogle | 201 | 116% | 595 | AWS CodeBuild vs Google Cloud Build → | |
| 16 | Octopus DeployOctopus Deploy | 192 | 110% | 389 | AWS CodeBuild vs Octopus Deploy → | |
| 17 | Bitbucket PipelinesAtlassian | 183 | 105% | 278 | AWS CodeBuild vs Bitbucket Pipelines → | |
| 18 | Flux CDCNCF | 179 | 103% | 348 | AWS CodeBuild vs Flux CD → | |
| 19 | BitriseBitrise | 172 | 99% | 272 | AWS CodeBuild vs Bitrise → | |
| 20 | TestFlightApple | 153 | 88% | 232 | AWS CodeBuild vs TestFlight → | |
| 21 | Travis CITravis CI | 129 | 74% | 1,137 | AWS CodeBuild vs Travis CI → | |
| 22 | BuildkiteBuildkite | 120 | 69% | 305 | soon | |
| 23 | 119 | 68% | 376 | soon | ||
| 24 | AWS CodeDeployAmazon Web Services | 111 | 64% | 182 | soon | |
| 25 | TektonContinuous Delivery Foundation | 106 | 61% | 648 | soon | |
| 26 | SpinnakerSpinnaker | 105 | 60% | 312 | soon | |
| 27 | AtlantisAtlantis (Runatlantis) | 70 | 40% | 145 | soon | |
| 28 | Concourse CIConcourse | 66 | 38% | 151 | soon | |
| 29 | CloudBeesCloudBees | 62 | 36% | 180 | soon | |
| 30 | XL ReleaseDigital.ai | 54 | 31% | 205 | soon | |
| 31 | CodemagicNevercode | 36 | 21% | 38 | soon | |
| 32 | UrbanCode DeployIBM | 35 | 20% | 156 | soon | |
| 33 | XL DeployDigital.ai | 33 | 19% | 113 | soon | |
| 34 | GitLab RunnerGitLab | 32 | 18% | 71 | soon | |
| 35 | KargoAkuity | 29 | 17% | 75 | soon | |
| 36 | AutoRABITAutoRABIT | 27 | 16% | 85 | soon | |
| 37 | ScrewdriverYahoo | 27 | 16% | 84 | soon | |
| 38 | FlosumFlosum | 23 | 13% | 50 | soon | |
| 39 | CruiseControlThoughtWorks | 22 | 13% | 8 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on AWS CodeBuild users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 ci cd are named by companies instead of AWS CodeBuild: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, GitLab CI/CD by 3,638, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/aws-codebuild/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
AWS CodeBuild alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to AWS CodeBuild?
Jenkins: 6,457 companies name it in their own job postings, against 174 for AWS CodeBuild.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on AWS CodeBuild
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.