AWS CodePipeline alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 ci cd are named by companies instead of AWS CodePipeline: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, GitLab CI/CD by 3,638.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- AWS CodePipeline, companies in postings
- 365
- Most used alternative
- Jenkins · 6,457
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Jenkins
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
ci cd companies choose instead of AWS CodePipeline
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs AWS CodePipeline | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JenkinsContinuous Delivery Foundation | 6,457 | 1769% | 27,488 | AWS CodePipeline vs Jenkins → | |
| 2 | GitHub ActionsMicrosoft | 6,089 | 1668% | 16,950 | AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Actions → | |
| 3 | GitLab CI/CDGitLab | 3,638 | 997% | 11,525 | AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab CI/CD → | |
| 4 | Argo CDCloud Native Computing Foundation | 2,387 | 654% | 5,952 | AWS CodePipeline vs Argo CD → | |
| 5 | CircleCICircleCI | 671 | 184% | 1,263 | AWS CodePipeline vs CircleCI → | |
| 6 | Azure PipelinesMicrosoft | 549 | 150% | 1,155 | AWS CodePipeline vs Azure Pipelines → | |
| 7 | Atlassian BambooAtlassian | 521 | 143% | 1,297 | AWS CodePipeline vs Atlassian Bamboo → | |
| 8 | TeamCityJetBrains | 379 | 104% | 1,166 | AWS CodePipeline vs TeamCity → | |
| 9 | fastlanefastlane | 267 | 73% | 554 | AWS CodePipeline vs fastlane → | |
| 10 | CopadoCopado | 266 | 73% | 660 | AWS CodePipeline vs Copado → | |
| 11 | Salesforce DXSalesforce | 260 | 71% | 516 | AWS CodePipeline vs Salesforce DX → | |
| 12 | HarnessHarness | 226 | 62% | 1,082 | AWS CodePipeline vs Harness → | |
| 13 | GearsetGearset | 214 | 59% | 399 | AWS CodePipeline vs Gearset → | |
| 14 | Google Cloud BuildGoogle | 201 | 55% | 595 | AWS CodePipeline vs Google Cloud Build → | |
| 15 | Octopus DeployOctopus Deploy | 192 | 53% | 389 | AWS CodePipeline vs Octopus Deploy → | |
| 16 | Bitbucket PipelinesAtlassian | 183 | 50% | 278 | AWS CodePipeline vs Bitbucket Pipelines → | |
| 17 | Flux CDCNCF | 179 | 49% | 348 | AWS CodePipeline vs Flux CD → | |
| 18 | AWS CodeBuildAmazon | 174 | 48% | 315 | AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild → | |
| 19 | BitriseBitrise | 172 | 47% | 272 | AWS CodePipeline vs Bitrise → | |
| 20 | TestFlightApple | 153 | 42% | 232 | AWS CodePipeline vs TestFlight → | |
| 21 | Travis CITravis CI | 129 | 35% | 1,137 | AWS CodePipeline vs Travis CI → | |
| 22 | BuildkiteBuildkite | 120 | 33% | 305 | soon | |
| 23 | 119 | 33% | 376 | soon | ||
| 24 | AWS CodeDeployAmazon Web Services | 111 | 30% | 182 | soon | |
| 25 | TektonContinuous Delivery Foundation | 106 | 29% | 648 | soon | |
| 26 | SpinnakerSpinnaker | 105 | 29% | 312 | soon | |
| 27 | AtlantisAtlantis (Runatlantis) | 70 | 19% | 145 | soon | |
| 28 | Concourse CIConcourse | 66 | 18% | 151 | soon | |
| 29 | CloudBeesCloudBees | 62 | 17% | 180 | soon | |
| 30 | XL ReleaseDigital.ai | 54 | 15% | 205 | soon | |
| 31 | CodemagicNevercode | 36 | 10% | 38 | soon | |
| 32 | UrbanCode DeployIBM | 35 | 10% | 156 | soon | |
| 33 | XL DeployDigital.ai | 33 | 9% | 113 | soon | |
| 34 | GitLab RunnerGitLab | 32 | 9% | 71 | soon | |
| 35 | KargoAkuity | 29 | 8% | 75 | soon | |
| 36 | AutoRABITAutoRABIT | 27 | 7% | 85 | soon | |
| 37 | ScrewdriverYahoo | 27 | 7% | 84 | soon | |
| 38 | FlosumFlosum | 23 | 6% | 50 | soon | |
| 39 | CruiseControlThoughtWorks | 22 | 6% | 8 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on AWS CodePipeline users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 ci cd are named by companies instead of AWS CodePipeline: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, GitLab CI/CD by 3,638, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/aws-codepipeline/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
AWS CodePipeline alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to AWS CodePipeline?
Jenkins: 6,457 companies name it in their own job postings, against 365 for AWS CodePipeline.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on AWS CodePipeline
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.