Tools · ai coding assistants · Alternatives

Cursor alternatives_

As of 4 November 2026, 22 ai coding assistants are named by companies instead of Cursor: Claude Code by 5,532 companies, GitHub Copilot by 3,165, Codex by 2,265.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Cursor, companies in postings
4,259
Most used alternative
Claude Code · 5,532
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Claude Code
Alternatives ranked
22
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01 — Ranked by evidence

ai coding assistants companies choose instead of Cursor

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Cursorpostings, 90 dCompare
1
Claude CodeAnthropic
5,532130%14,085Cursor vs Claude Code →
2
3,16574%10,443Cursor vs GitHub Copilot →
3
CodexOpenAI
2,26553%5,911Cursor vs Codex →
4
LovableLovable
41310%730Cursor vs Lovable →
5
WindsurfCognition
2396%634Cursor vs Windsurf →
6
ReplitReplit
1894%318Cursor vs Replit →
7
1864%303Cursor vs Figma Make →
8
KiroAmazon Web Services
1574%666Cursor vs Kiro →
9
1574%375Cursor vs OpenCode →
10
DevinCognition
1313%786Cursor vs Devin →
11
v0Vercel
802%137soon
12
792%201soon
13
Amazon Q DeveloperAmazon Web Services
652%157soon
14
561%150soon
15
ClineCline
531%129soon
16
CodeRabbitCodeRabbit
501%77soon
17
Spec KitGitHub
291%64soon
18
Snowflake Cortex CodeSnowflake
281%71soon
19
Gemini Code AssistGoogle
261%83soon
20
OpenSpec
221%47soon
21
GitLab DuoGitLab
210%230soon
22
Mistral VibeMistral AI
130%43soon
17,215 companies name a ai coding assistant in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Cursor users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

22 ai coding assistants are named by companies instead of Cursor: Claude Code by 5,532 companies, GitHub Copilot by 3,165, Codex by 2,265, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/cursor/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Cursor alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Cursor?

Claude Code: 5,532 companies name it in their own job postings, against 4,259 for Cursor.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on Cursor
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free