Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEGitHub Advanced Security alternatives_
As of 4 November 2026, 24 application security testing are named by companies instead of GitHub Advanced Security: Burp Suite by 760 companies, Snyk by 372, OWASP ZAP by 312.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- GitHub Advanced Security, companies in postings
- 142
- Most used alternative
- Burp Suite · 760
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Burp Suite
- Alternatives ranked
- 24
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
application security testing companies choose instead of GitHub Advanced Security
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs GitHub Advanced Security | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burp SuitePortSwigger | 760 | 535% | 1,363 | GitHub Advanced Security vs Burp Suite → | |
| 2 | SnykSnyk | 372 | 262% | 845 | GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk → | |
| 3 | OWASP ZAPOWASP Foundation | 312 | 220% | 510 | GitHub Advanced Security vs OWASP ZAP → | |
| 4 | TrivyAqua Security | 253 | 178% | 474 | GitHub Advanced Security vs Trivy → | |
| 5 | CheckmarxCheckmarx | 244 | 172% | 643 | GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx → | |
| 6 | FortifyOpenText | 233 | 164% | 747 | GitHub Advanced Security vs Fortify → | |
| 7 | VeracodeVeracode | 148 | 104% | 469 | GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode → | |
| 8 | SemgrepSemgrep | 122 | 86% | 232 | soon | |
| 9 | CheckovPalo Alto Networks | 102 | 72% | 187 | soon | |
| 10 | CoveritySynopsys | 95 | 67% | 311 | soon | |
| 11 | Black DuckBlack Duck Software | 91 | 64% | 308 | soon | |
| 12 | DependabotGitHub | 86 | 61% | 128 | soon | |
| 13 | CodeQLGitHub | 74 | 52% | 134 | soon | |
| 14 | cosignSigstore | 70 | 49% | 117 | soon | |
| 15 | SigstoreLinux Foundation | 64 | 45% | 229 | soon | |
| 16 | SonatypeSonatype | 58 | 41% | 120 | soon | |
| 17 | CycloneDXOWASP Foundation | 51 | 36% | 131 | soon | |
| 18 | HCL AppScanHCL | 46 | 32% | 82 | soon | |
| 19 | WebInspectOpenText | 45 | 32% | 80 | soon | |
| 20 | GrypeAnchore | 40 | 28% | 98 | soon | |
| 21 | SPDXLinux Foundation | 39 | 27% | 102 | soon | |
| 22 | SyftAnchore | 33 | 23% | 76 | soon | |
| 23 | Aikido SecurityAikido | 30 | 21% | 53 | soon | |
| 24 | GitGuardianGitGuardian | 12 | 8% | 46 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on GitHub Advanced Security users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
24 application security testing are named by companies instead of GitHub Advanced Security: Burp Suite by 760 companies, Snyk by 372, OWASP ZAP by 312, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/github-advanced-security/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
GitHub Advanced Security alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to GitHub Advanced Security?
Burp Suite: 760 companies name it in their own job postings, against 142 for GitHub Advanced Security.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on GitHub Advanced Security
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.