Google Cloud Spanner alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 32 relational databases are named by companies instead of Google Cloud Spanner: PostgreSQL by 12,519 companies, Oracle Database by 10,129, Microsoft SQL Server by 9,342.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Google Cloud Spanner, companies in postings
- 134
- Most used alternative
- PostgreSQL · 12,519
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- PostgreSQL
- Alternatives ranked
- 32
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
relational databases companies choose instead of Google Cloud Spanner
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Google Cloud Spanner | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PostgreSQLPostgreSQL Global Development Group | 12,519 | 9343% | 37,204 | Google Cloud Spanner vs PostgreSQL → | |
| 2 | Oracle DatabaseOracle | 10,129 | 7559% | 22,634 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Database → | |
| 3 | Microsoft SQL ServerMicrosoft | 9,342 | 6972% | 29,555 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Microsoft SQL Server → | |
| 4 | MySQLOracle | 8,789 | 6559% | 21,694 | Google Cloud Spanner vs MySQL → | |
| 5 | Amazon RDSAmazon Web Services | 2,889 | 2156% | 6,705 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS → | |
| 6 | Microsoft AccessMicrosoft | 1,422 | 1061% | 3,323 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Microsoft Access → | |
| 7 | Azure SQL DatabaseMicrosoft | 1,384 | 1033% | 3,629 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Azure SQL Database → | |
| 8 | IBM Db2IBM | 1,063 | 793% | 3,839 | Google Cloud Spanner vs IBM Db2 → | |
| 9 | Amazon AuroraAmazon Web Services | 1,020 | 761% | 2,257 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon Aurora → | |
| 10 | SAP HANASAP | 1,004 | 749% | 4,526 | Google Cloud Spanner vs SAP HANA → | |
| 11 | MariaDBMariaDB Foundation | 901 | 672% | 1,589 | Google Cloud Spanner vs MariaDB → | |
| 12 | SQLiteSQLite Consortium | 519 | 387% | 947 | Google Cloud Spanner vs SQLite → | |
| 13 | Google Cloud SQLGoogle | 423 | 316% | 962 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL → | |
| 14 | SybaseSAP | 265 | 198% | 742 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Sybase → | |
| 15 | Oracle ExadataOracle | 177 | 132% | 547 | Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Exadata → | |
| 16 | Oracle RACOracle | 135 | 101% | 402 | soon | |
| 17 | Azure SQL Managed InstanceMicrosoft | 108 | 81% | 207 | soon | |
| 18 | NeonNeon | 87 | 65% | 145 | soon | |
| 19 | CockroachDBCockroach Labs | 71 | 53% | 187 | soon | |
| 20 | InformixHCL Software | 64 | 48% | 121 | soon | |
| 21 | 60 | 45% | 215 | soon | ||
| 22 | Azure Database for PostgreSQLMicrosoft | 55 | 41% | 153 | soon | |
| 23 | AlloyDBGoogle | 54 | 40% | 275 | soon | |
| 24 | IBM Db2 for iIBM | 44 | 33% | 98 | soon | |
| 25 | SingleStoreSingleStore | 37 | 28% | 154 | soon | |
| 26 | Databricks LakebaseDatabricks | 32 | 24% | 1,408 | soon | |
| 27 | FirebirdFirebird Foundation | 29 | 22% | 53 | soon | |
| 28 | TiDBPingCAP | 24 | 18% | 42 | soon | |
| 29 | MaxDBSAP | 22 | 16% | 50 | soon | |
| 30 | SAP ASE (Sybase)SAP | 22 | 16% | 53 | soon | |
| 31 | SAP ASESAP | 18 | 13% | 29 | soon | |
| 32 | YugabyteDBYugabyte | 16 | 12% | 58 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Google Cloud Spanner users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
32 relational databases are named by companies instead of Google Cloud Spanner: PostgreSQL by 12,519 companies, Oracle Database by 10,129, Microsoft SQL Server by 9,342, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/google-cloud-spanner/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Google Cloud Spanner alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Google Cloud Spanner?
PostgreSQL: 12,519 companies name it in their own job postings, against 134 for Google Cloud Spanner.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Google Cloud Spanner
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.