Hugging Face PEFT alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 ml frameworks are named by companies instead of Hugging Face PEFT: PyTorch by 5,581 companies, TensorFlow by 4,387, scikit-learn by 1,639.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Hugging Face PEFT, companies in postings
- 205
- Most used alternative
- PyTorch · 5,581
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- PyTorch
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
ml frameworks companies choose instead of Hugging Face PEFT
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Hugging Face PEFT | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PyTorchPyTorch Foundation | 5,581 | 2722% | 17,504 | Hugging Face PEFT vs PyTorch → | |
| 2 | TensorFlowGoogle | 4,387 | 2140% | 12,007 | Hugging Face PEFT vs TensorFlow → | |
| 3 | scikit-learnscikit-learn developers | 1,639 | 800% | 3,810 | Hugging Face PEFT vs scikit-learn → | |
| 4 | OpenCVOpenCV.org | 812 | 396% | 1,586 | Hugging Face PEFT vs OpenCV → | |
| 5 | JAXGoogle | 740 | 361% | 1,878 | Hugging Face PEFT vs JAX → | |
| 6 | Hugging Face TransformersHugging Face | 616 | 300% | 1,263 | Hugging Face PEFT vs Hugging Face Transformers → | |
| 7 | KerasGoogle | 605 | 295% | 1,320 | Hugging Face PEFT vs Keras → | |
| 8 | XGBoostDMLC | 574 | 280% | 1,097 | Hugging Face PEFT vs XGBoost → | |
| 9 | ONNXLinux Foundation | 435 | 212% | 835 | Hugging Face PEFT vs ONNX → | |
| 10 | LightGBMMicrosoft | 267 | 130% | 511 | Hugging Face PEFT vs LightGBM → | |
| 11 | Core MLApple | 214 | 104% | 426 | Hugging Face PEFT vs Core ML → | |
| 12 | DeepSpeedMicrosoft | 207 | 101% | 328 | Hugging Face PEFT vs DeepSpeed → | |
| 13 | spaCyExplosion | 193 | 94% | 388 | Hugging Face PEFT vs spaCy → | |
| 14 | PyTorch FSDPMeta | 163 | 80% | 269 | Hugging Face PEFT vs PyTorch FSDP → | |
| 15 | YOLOUltralytics | 163 | 80% | 281 | Hugging Face PEFT vs YOLO → | |
| 16 | NLTKNLTK Project | 145 | 71% | 278 | Hugging Face PEFT vs NLTK → | |
| 17 | TensorFlow LiteGoogle | 127 | 62% | 513 | soon | |
| 18 | Megatron-LMNVIDIA | 113 | 55% | 284 | soon | |
| 19 | NVIDIA NeMoNVIDIA | 111 | 54% | 579 | soon | |
| 20 | SHAPSHAP | 100 | 49% | 215 | soon | |
| 21 | Apache TVMApache Software Foundation | 94 | 46% | 256 | soon | |
| 22 | XLAOpenXLA | 79 | 39% | 246 | soon | |
| 23 | TRLHugging Face | 61 | 30% | 96 | soon | |
| 24 | Spark MLlibApache Software Foundation | 60 | 29% | 175 | soon | |
| 25 | 52 | 25% | 142 | soon | ||
| 26 | LIMELIME | 50 | 24% | 110 | soon | |
| 27 | CatBoostYandex | 47 | 23% | 94 | soon | |
| 28 | CaffeBAIR | 45 | 22% | 87 | soon | |
| 29 | HALCONMVTec | 42 | 20% | 113 | soon | |
| 30 | verl | 40 | 20% | 113 | soon | |
| 31 | scikit-imagescikit-image | 37 | 18% | 69 | soon | |
| 32 | Amazon ComprehendAmazon | 34 | 17% | 81 | soon | |
| 33 | GensimRARE Technologies | 34 | 17% | 54 | soon | |
| 34 | FlashAttentionDao-AILab | 28 | 14% | 92 | soon | |
| 35 | Apache MXNetApache Software Foundation | 27 | 13% | 146 | soon | |
| 36 | GymnasiumFarama Foundation | 27 | 13% | 41 | soon | |
| 37 | MediaPipeGoogle | 25 | 12% | 24 | soon | |
| 38 | IREEOpenXLA | 23 | 11% | 53 | soon | |
| 39 | MLXApple | 23 | 11% | 74 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Hugging Face PEFT users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 ml frameworks are named by companies instead of Hugging Face PEFT: PyTorch by 5,581 companies, TensorFlow by 4,387, scikit-learn by 1,639, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/hugging-face-peft/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Hugging Face PEFT alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Hugging Face PEFT?
PyTorch: 5,581 companies name it in their own job postings, against 205 for Hugging Face PEFT.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Hugging Face PEFT
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.