Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · api specs data formats · Alternatives

Redfish alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of Redfish: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Redfish, companies in postings
137
Most used alternative
JSON · 6,396
Fastest hiring, 90 days
JSON
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

api specs data formats companies choose instead of Redfish

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Redfishpostings, 90 dCompare
1
JSONEcma International
6,3964669%19,737Redfish vs JSON →
2
XMLW3C
5,2643842%12,841Redfish vs XML →
3
Model Context ProtocolAnthropic
4,8923571%16,002Redfish vs Model Context Protocol →
4
GraphQLGraphQL Foundation
4,0892985%12,076Redfish vs GraphQL →
5
SOAPW3C
3,6612672%10,243Redfish vs SOAP →
6
gRPCCloud Native Computing Foundation
1,7531280%4,571Redfish vs gRPC →
7
OpenAPIOpenAPI Initiative
1,4321045%3,245Redfish vs OpenAPI →
8
YAMLYAML Language Development Team
1,029751%2,569Redfish vs YAML →
9
Microsoft GraphMicrosoft
942688%2,115Redfish vs Microsoft Graph →
10
ODataOASIS
844616%3,073Redfish vs OData →
11
XSLTW3C
820599%1,501Redfish vs XSLT →
12
CSVIETF
782571%1,180Redfish vs CSV →
13
SAP IDocSAP
722527%2,746Redfish vs SAP IDoc →
14
Apache ParquetApache Software Foundation
690504%1,246Redfish vs Apache Parquet →
15
Protocol BuffersGoogle
566413%1,102Redfish vs Protocol Buffers →
16
Agent2Agent (A2A) ProtocolLinux Foundation
443323%1,572Redfish vs Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol →
17
PDFAdobe
405296%839Redfish vs PDF →
18
ANSI X12ASC X12
371271%761Redfish vs ANSI X12 →
19
Markdown
337246%585Redfish vs Markdown →
20
XML Schema (XSD)W3C
291212%551Redfish vs XML Schema (XSD) →
21
Apache AvroApache Software Foundation
280204%560Redfish vs Apache Avro →
22
ISO 20022ISO
272199%763Redfish vs ISO 20022 →
23
WSDLW3C
256187%511Redfish vs WSDL →
24
UN/EDIFACTUnited Nations
253185%406Redfish vs UN/EDIFACT →
25
RDFW3C
221161%813Redfish vs RDF →
26
Web Ontology LanguageW3C
216158%703Redfish vs Web Ontology Language →
27
JSON SchemaJSON Schema organization
169123%301Redfish vs JSON Schema →
28
H.264ITU-T / ISO
160117%327Redfish vs H.264 →
29
XBRLXBRL International
152111%294Redfish vs XBRL →
30
H.265ITU-T
12692%244soon
31
RSSRSS Advisory Board
12289%321soon
32
Apache ORCApache Software Foundation
11886%235soon
33
tRPCtRPC contributors
10677%188soon
34
RAMLMuleSoft
10577%187soon
35
Schema.orgSchema.org
10375%148soon
36
JSON-LDW3C
9972%146soon
37
DITAOASIS
9670%197soon
38
YANGIETF
8965%286soon
39
OpenUSDAlliance for OpenUSD
8864%291soon
38,897 companies name a api specs data format in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Redfish users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of Redfish: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/redfish/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Redfish alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Redfish?

JSON: 6,396 companies name it in their own job postings, against 137 for Redfish.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on Redfish
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

Start free
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market