Zigbee alternatives_
As of 4 November 2026, 39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of Zigbee: Modbus by 2,067 companies, CAN bus by 1,760, SPI by 1,559.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Zigbee, companies in postings
- 179
- Most used alternative
- Modbus · 2,067
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Modbus
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
iot platforms protocols companies choose instead of Zigbee
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Zigbee | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ModbusModbus Organization | 2,067 | 1155% | 5,698 | Zigbee vs Modbus → | |
| 2 | CAN busISO | 1,760 | 983% | 5,610 | Zigbee vs CAN bus → | |
| 3 | SPIMotorola | 1,559 | 871% | 4,935 | Zigbee vs SPI → | |
| 4 | I2CNXP | 1,515 | 846% | 4,820 | Zigbee vs I2C → | |
| 5 | UART(industry standard) | 1,237 | 691% | 3,224 | Zigbee vs UART → | |
| 6 | MQTTOASIS | 1,201 | 671% | 2,656 | Zigbee vs MQTT → | |
| 7 | EtherNet/IPODVA | 1,048 | 585% | 2,374 | Zigbee vs EtherNet/IP → | |
| 8 | OPC UAOPC Foundation | 935 | 522% | 2,090 | Zigbee vs OPC UA → | |
| 9 | PROFINETPROFIBUS & PROFINET International | 914 | 511% | 2,036 | Zigbee vs PROFINET → | |
| 10 | PROFIBUSPROFIBUS & PROFINET International | 701 | 392% | 1,645 | Zigbee vs PROFIBUS → | |
| 11 | BACnetASHRAE | 598 | 334% | 1,743 | Zigbee vs BACnet → | |
| 12 | USBUSB Implementers Forum | 597 | 334% | 1,786 | Zigbee vs USB → | |
| 13 | Bluetooth Low EnergyBluetooth SIG | 473 | 264% | 934 | Zigbee vs Bluetooth Low Energy → | |
| 14 | RS-485TIA | 464 | 259% | 1,001 | Zigbee vs RS-485 → | |
| 15 | OPC (OPC UA)OPC Foundation | 451 | 252% | 1,193 | Zigbee vs OPC (OPC UA) → | |
| 16 | RS-232EIA | 446 | 249% | 1,038 | Zigbee vs RS-232 → | |
| 17 | KNXKNX Association | 401 | 224% | 703 | Zigbee vs KNX → | |
| 18 | EtherCATEtherCAT Technology Group | 378 | 211% | 884 | Zigbee vs EtherCAT → | |
| 19 | BluetoothBluetooth SIG | 346 | 193% | 659 | Zigbee vs Bluetooth → | |
| 20 | IEC 61850IEC | 324 | 181% | 1,126 | Zigbee vs IEC 61850 → | |
| 21 | DNP3IEEE | 321 | 179% | 895 | Zigbee vs DNP3 → | |
| 22 | DeviceNetODVA | 285 | 159% | 598 | Zigbee vs DeviceNet → | |
| 23 | DDS (Data Distribution Service)Object Management Group | 280 | 156% | 663 | Zigbee vs DDS (Data Distribution Service) → | |
| 24 | LIN BusLIN Consortium | 266 | 149% | 1,210 | Zigbee vs LIN Bus → | |
| 25 | CAN FDBosch | 181 | 101% | 545 | Zigbee vs CAN FD → | |
| 26 | RS-422TIA/EIA | 180 | 101% | 607 | Zigbee vs RS-422 → | |
| 27 | SAE J1939SAE International | 179 | 100% | 468 | Zigbee vs SAE J1939 → | |
| 28 | 175 | 98% | 552 | Zigbee vs UDS (ISO 14229) → | ||
| 29 | 168 | 94% | 380 | Zigbee vs GPIO → | ||
| 30 | CANopenCAN in Automation | 162 | 91% | 293 | Zigbee vs CANopen → | |
| 31 | NFCNFC Forum | 147 | 82% | 366 | Zigbee vs NFC → | |
| 32 | DMX512USITT | 122 | 68% | 150 | soon | |
| 33 | LonWorksEchelon | 115 | 64% | 403 | soon | |
| 34 | ARINCSAE ITT | 114 | 64% | 492 | soon | |
| 35 | EcoStruxureSchneider Electric | 109 | 61% | 339 | soon | |
| 36 | LoRaWANLoRa Alliance | 108 | 60% | 185 | soon | |
| 37 | Azure IoT HubMicrosoft | 100 | 56% | 162 | soon | |
| 38 | DALIDiiA | 99 | 55% | 154 | soon | |
| 39 | HART ProtocolFieldComm Group | 99 | 55% | 265 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Zigbee users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of Zigbee: Modbus by 2,067 companies, CAN bus by 1,760, SPI by 1,559, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/zigbee/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Zigbee alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Zigbee?
Modbus: 2,067 companies name it in their own job postings, against 179 for Zigbee.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Zigbee
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.