Auth0 alternatives_
As of 4 November 2026, 39 identity are named by companies instead of Auth0: Active Directory by 8,045 companies, Microsoft Entra ID by 6,276, OAuth by 4,173.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Auth0, companies in postings
- 347
- Most used alternative
- Active Directory · 8,045
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Active Directory
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
Identity companies choose instead of Auth0
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Auth0 | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active DirectoryMicrosoft | 8,045 | 2318% | 20,501 | Auth0 vs Active Directory → | |
| 2 | Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft | 6,276 | 1809% | 16,203 | Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID → | |
| 3 | OAuthIETF | 4,173 | 1203% | 10,994 | Auth0 vs OAuth → | |
| 4 | OpenID ConnectOpenID Foundation | 2,634 | 759% | 6,510 | Auth0 vs OpenID Connect → | |
| 5 | SAMLOASIS | 2,309 | 665% | 5,573 | Auth0 vs SAML → | |
| 6 | JSON Web TokenIETF | 1,752 | 505% | 3,904 | Auth0 vs JSON Web Token → | |
| 7 | OktaOkta | 1,656 | 477% | 4,378 | Auth0 vs Okta → | |
| 8 | LDAPIETF | 1,398 | 403% | 3,859 | Auth0 vs LDAP → | |
| 9 | SCIMIETF | 844 | 243% | 1,707 | Auth0 vs SCIM → | |
| 10 | KeycloakRed Hat | 558 | 161% | 1,144 | Auth0 vs Keycloak → | |
| 11 | KerberosMIT | 451 | 130% | 905 | Auth0 vs Kerberos → | |
| 12 | RADIUSIETF | 379 | 109% | 935 | Auth0 vs RADIUS → | |
| 13 | AWS IAMAmazon Web Services | 342 | 99% | 815 | Auth0 vs AWS IAM → | |
| 14 | Ping IdentityPing Identity | 281 | 81% | 974 | Auth0 vs Ping Identity → | |
| 15 | Amazon CognitoAmazon Web Services | 278 | 80% | 500 | Auth0 vs Amazon Cognito → | |
| 16 | Active Directory Federation ServicesMicrosoft | 246 | 71% | 595 | Auth0 vs Active Directory Federation Services → | |
| 17 | 239 | 69% | 646 | Auth0 vs SAP Identity Authentication Service → | ||
| 18 | Microsoft Entra ConnectMicrosoft | 217 | 63% | 452 | Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra Connect → | |
| 19 | RSA SecurIDRSA Security | 204 | 59% | 464 | Auth0 vs RSA SecurID → | |
| 20 | FIDO2FIDO Alliance | 198 | 57% | 457 | Auth0 vs FIDO2 → | |
| 21 | TACACS+Cisco | 189 | 54% | 404 | Auth0 vs TACACS+ → | |
| 22 | AWS OrganizationsAmazon | 172 | 50% | 299 | Auth0 vs AWS Organizations → | |
| 23 | Cisco DuoCisco | 156 | 45% | 307 | Auth0 vs Cisco Duo → | |
| 24 | Azure Managed IdentityMicrosoft | 154 | 44% | 323 | Auth0 vs Azure Managed Identity → | |
| 25 | JumpCloudJumpCloud | 152 | 44% | 230 | Auth0 vs JumpCloud → | |
| 26 | PasskeysFIDO Alliance | 138 | 40% | 242 | soon | |
| 27 | WebAuthnW3C | 114 | 33% | 240 | soon | |
| 28 | ForgeRockPing Identity | 108 | 31% | 342 | soon | |
| 29 | Google Cloud IdentityGoogle | 93 | 27% | 263 | soon | |
| 30 | SPIFFECNCF | 79 | 23% | 202 | soon | |
| 31 | PingFederatePing Identity | 63 | 18% | 193 | soon | |
| 32 | OpenStack KeystoneOpenInfra Foundation | 56 | 16% | 113 | soon | |
| 33 | Azure AD B2CMicrosoft | 52 | 15% | 123 | soon | |
| 34 | CA SiteMinderBroadcom | 51 | 15% | 115 | soon | |
| 35 | FreeIPARed Hat | 49 | 14% | 91 | soon | |
| 36 | OneLoginOne Identity | 41 | 12% | 48 | soon | |
| 37 | IdentityServerDuende Software | 40 | 12% | 71 | soon | |
| 38 | Microsoft AuthenticatorMicrosoft | 40 | 12% | 157 | soon | |
| 39 | OpenLDAPOpenLDAP Foundation | 40 | 12% | 99 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Auth0 users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 identity are named by companies instead of Auth0: Active Directory by 8,045 companies, Microsoft Entra ID by 6,276, OAuth by 4,173, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/auth0/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Auth0 alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Auth0?
Active Directory: 8,045 companies name it in their own job postings, against 347 for Auth0.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Auth0
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.