Tools · Category

clinical research rwd, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Veeva leads clinical research rwd with 465 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Veeva Vault at 245.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Veeva · 465
Runner-up
Veeva Vault · 245
Most hiring, 90 days
Veeva
Highest postings per company
Clario
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
2,588companies across the category
18%of them on Veeva
8,672postings naming a clinical research rwd in 90 days
23tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every clinical research rwd we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
VeevaVeeva Systems
465
2,6945.8
2
Veeva VaultVeeva Systems
245
8563.5
3
REDCapVanderbilt University
243
6932.9
4
IQVIAIQVIA
205
1,0185.0
5
CDISCCDISC
194
4672.4
6
190
5392.8
7
169
4822.9
8
eCTDICH
126
1961.6
9
116
2992.6
10
Medidata RaveDassault Systemes
108
2362.2
11
OHDSIOHDSI
99
1781.8
12
73
1582.2
13
63
1282.0
14
OnCoreAdvarra
63
1852.9
15
MedidataDassault Systemes
48
1072.2
16
WHODrugUppsala Monitoring Centre
37
752.0
17
Pinnacle 21Certara
28
612.2
18
DataVision
27
632.3
19
Oracle ClinicalOracle
24
451.9
20
iEnvisioniEnvision
21
663.1
21
Flatiron HealthRoche
17
281.6
22
Velos eResearchVelos
16
281.8
23
ClarioClario
11
706.4
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Veeva leads clinical research rwd with 465 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Veeva Vault at 245. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/clinical-research-rwd)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

clinical research rwd: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free