Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · api specs data formats · Alternatives

ISO 20022 alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of ISO 20022: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

ISO 20022, companies in postings
272
Most used alternative
JSON · 6,396
Fastest hiring, 90 days
JSON
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

api specs data formats companies choose instead of ISO 20022

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs ISO 20022postings, 90 dCompare
1
JSONEcma International
6,3962351%19,737ISO 20022 vs JSON →
2
XMLW3C
5,2641935%12,841ISO 20022 vs XML →
3
Model Context ProtocolAnthropic
4,8921799%16,002ISO 20022 vs Model Context Protocol →
4
GraphQLGraphQL Foundation
4,0891503%12,076ISO 20022 vs GraphQL →
5
SOAPW3C
3,6611346%10,243ISO 20022 vs SOAP →
6
gRPCCloud Native Computing Foundation
1,753644%4,571ISO 20022 vs gRPC →
7
OpenAPIOpenAPI Initiative
1,432526%3,245ISO 20022 vs OpenAPI →
8
YAMLYAML Language Development Team
1,029378%2,569ISO 20022 vs YAML →
9
Microsoft GraphMicrosoft
942346%2,115ISO 20022 vs Microsoft Graph →
10
ODataOASIS
844310%3,073ISO 20022 vs OData →
11
XSLTW3C
820301%1,501ISO 20022 vs XSLT →
12
CSVIETF
782288%1,180ISO 20022 vs CSV →
13
SAP IDocSAP
722265%2,746ISO 20022 vs SAP IDoc →
14
Apache ParquetApache Software Foundation
690254%1,246ISO 20022 vs Apache Parquet →
15
Protocol BuffersGoogle
566208%1,102ISO 20022 vs Protocol Buffers →
16
Agent2Agent (A2A) ProtocolLinux Foundation
443163%1,572ISO 20022 vs Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol →
17
PDFAdobe
405149%839ISO 20022 vs PDF →
18
ANSI X12ASC X12
371136%761ISO 20022 vs ANSI X12 →
19
Markdown
337124%585ISO 20022 vs Markdown →
20
XML Schema (XSD)W3C
291107%551ISO 20022 vs XML Schema (XSD) →
21
Apache AvroApache Software Foundation
280103%560ISO 20022 vs Apache Avro →
22
WSDLW3C
25694%511ISO 20022 vs WSDL →
23
UN/EDIFACTUnited Nations
25393%406ISO 20022 vs UN/EDIFACT →
24
RDFW3C
22181%813ISO 20022 vs RDF →
25
Web Ontology LanguageW3C
21679%703ISO 20022 vs Web Ontology Language →
26
JSON SchemaJSON Schema organization
16962%301ISO 20022 vs JSON Schema →
27
H.264ITU-T / ISO
16059%327ISO 20022 vs H.264 →
28
XBRLXBRL International
15256%294ISO 20022 vs XBRL →
29
RedfishDMTF
13750%661ISO 20022 vs Redfish →
30
H.265ITU-T
12646%244soon
31
RSSRSS Advisory Board
12245%321soon
32
Apache ORCApache Software Foundation
11843%235soon
33
tRPCtRPC contributors
10639%188soon
34
RAMLMuleSoft
10539%187soon
35
Schema.orgSchema.org
10338%148soon
36
JSON-LDW3C
9936%146soon
37
DITAOASIS
9635%197soon
38
YANGIETF
8933%286soon
39
OpenUSDAlliance for OpenUSD
8832%291soon
38,897 companies name a api specs data format in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on ISO 20022 users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of ISO 20022: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/iso-20022/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

ISO 20022 alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to ISO 20022?

JSON: 6,396 companies name it in their own job postings, against 272 for ISO 20022.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on ISO 20022
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

Start free
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market