GitLab CI/CD alternatives_
As of 4 November 2026, 39 ci cd are named by companies instead of GitLab CI/CD: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, Argo CD by 2,387.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- GitLab CI/CD, companies in postings
- 3,638
- Most used alternative
- Jenkins · 6,457
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Jenkins
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
ci cd companies choose instead of GitLab CI/CD
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs GitLab CI/CD | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JenkinsContinuous Delivery Foundation | 6,457 | 177% | 27,488 | GitLab CI/CD vs Jenkins → | |
| 2 | GitHub ActionsMicrosoft | 6,089 | 167% | 16,950 | GitLab CI/CD vs GitHub Actions → | |
| 3 | Argo CDCloud Native Computing Foundation | 2,387 | 66% | 5,952 | GitLab CI/CD vs Argo CD → | |
| 4 | CircleCICircleCI | 671 | 18% | 1,263 | GitLab CI/CD vs CircleCI → | |
| 5 | Azure PipelinesMicrosoft | 549 | 15% | 1,155 | GitLab CI/CD vs Azure Pipelines → | |
| 6 | Atlassian BambooAtlassian | 521 | 14% | 1,297 | GitLab CI/CD vs Atlassian Bamboo → | |
| 7 | TeamCityJetBrains | 379 | 10% | 1,166 | GitLab CI/CD vs TeamCity → | |
| 8 | AWS CodePipelineAmazon Web Services | 365 | 10% | 668 | GitLab CI/CD vs AWS CodePipeline → | |
| 9 | fastlanefastlane | 267 | 7% | 554 | GitLab CI/CD vs fastlane → | |
| 10 | CopadoCopado | 266 | 7% | 660 | GitLab CI/CD vs Copado → | |
| 11 | Salesforce DXSalesforce | 260 | 7% | 516 | GitLab CI/CD vs Salesforce DX → | |
| 12 | HarnessHarness | 226 | 6% | 1,082 | GitLab CI/CD vs Harness → | |
| 13 | GearsetGearset | 214 | 6% | 399 | GitLab CI/CD vs Gearset → | |
| 14 | Google Cloud BuildGoogle | 201 | 6% | 595 | GitLab CI/CD vs Google Cloud Build → | |
| 15 | Octopus DeployOctopus Deploy | 192 | 5% | 389 | GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy → | |
| 16 | Bitbucket PipelinesAtlassian | 183 | 5% | 278 | GitLab CI/CD vs Bitbucket Pipelines → | |
| 17 | Flux CDCNCF | 179 | 5% | 348 | GitLab CI/CD vs Flux CD → | |
| 18 | AWS CodeBuildAmazon | 174 | 5% | 315 | GitLab CI/CD vs AWS CodeBuild → | |
| 19 | BitriseBitrise | 172 | 5% | 272 | GitLab CI/CD vs Bitrise → | |
| 20 | TestFlightApple | 153 | 4% | 232 | GitLab CI/CD vs TestFlight → | |
| 21 | Travis CITravis CI | 129 | 4% | 1,137 | GitLab CI/CD vs Travis CI → | |
| 22 | BuildkiteBuildkite | 120 | 3% | 305 | soon | |
| 23 | 119 | 3% | 376 | soon | ||
| 24 | AWS CodeDeployAmazon Web Services | 111 | 3% | 182 | soon | |
| 25 | TektonContinuous Delivery Foundation | 106 | 3% | 648 | soon | |
| 26 | SpinnakerSpinnaker | 105 | 3% | 312 | soon | |
| 27 | AtlantisAtlantis (Runatlantis) | 70 | 2% | 145 | soon | |
| 28 | Concourse CIConcourse | 66 | 2% | 151 | soon | |
| 29 | CloudBeesCloudBees | 62 | 2% | 180 | soon | |
| 30 | XL ReleaseDigital.ai | 54 | 1% | 205 | soon | |
| 31 | CodemagicNevercode | 36 | 1% | 38 | soon | |
| 32 | UrbanCode DeployIBM | 35 | 1% | 156 | soon | |
| 33 | XL DeployDigital.ai | 33 | 1% | 113 | soon | |
| 34 | GitLab RunnerGitLab | 32 | 1% | 71 | soon | |
| 35 | KargoAkuity | 29 | 1% | 75 | soon | |
| 36 | AutoRABITAutoRABIT | 27 | 1% | 85 | soon | |
| 37 | ScrewdriverYahoo | 27 | 1% | 84 | soon | |
| 38 | FlosumFlosum | 23 | 1% | 50 | soon | |
| 39 | CruiseControlThoughtWorks | 22 | 1% | 8 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on GitLab CI/CD users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 ci cd are named by companies instead of GitLab CI/CD: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, Argo CD by 2,387, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/gitlab-ci/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
GitLab CI/CD alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to GitLab CI/CD?
Jenkins: 6,457 companies name it in their own job postings, against 3,638 for GitLab CI/CD.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on GitLab CI/CD
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.