Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · network protocols · Alternatives

Spanning Tree Protocol alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 network protocols are named by companies instead of Spanning Tree Protocol: TCP/IP by 5,615 companies, DNS by 3,903, DHCP by 2,671.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Spanning Tree Protocol, companies in postings
339
Most used alternative
TCP/IP · 5,615
Fastest hiring, 90 days
TCP/IP
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

network protocols companies choose instead of Spanning Tree Protocol

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Spanning Tree Protocolpostings, 90 dCompare
1
TCP/IPIETF
5,6151656%16,228Spanning Tree Protocol vs TCP/IP →
2
DNSIETF
3,9031151%8,974Spanning Tree Protocol vs DNS →
3
DHCPIETF
2,671788%6,100Spanning Tree Protocol vs DHCP →
4
2,080614%7,952Spanning Tree Protocol vs Ethernet →
5
1,577465%2,947Spanning Tree Protocol vs WebSocket →
6
1,467433%3,595Spanning Tree Protocol vs SSL/TLS →
7
VLANIEEE
1,296382%2,706Spanning Tree Protocol vs VLAN →
8
BGPIETF
1,261372%3,454Spanning Tree Protocol vs BGP →
9
1,138336%2,311Spanning Tree Protocol vs SFTP →
10
Wi-FiWi-Fi Alliance
1,003296%2,133Spanning Tree Protocol vs Wi-Fi →
11
SSHIETF
865255%1,772Spanning Tree Protocol vs SSH →
12
IPsecIETF
741219%1,728Spanning Tree Protocol vs IPsec →
13
SNMPIETF
716211%1,675Spanning Tree Protocol vs SNMP →
14
FTPIETF
710209%1,132Spanning Tree Protocol vs FTP →
15
SIPIETF
608179%1,553Spanning Tree Protocol vs SIP →
16
MPLSIETF
607179%1,626Spanning Tree Protocol vs MPLS →
17
mTLSIETF
503148%1,177Spanning Tree Protocol vs mTLS →
18
SMTPIETF
469138%832Spanning Tree Protocol vs SMTP →
19
UDPIETF
448132%985Spanning Tree Protocol vs UDP →
20
VXLANIETF
445131%1,514Spanning Tree Protocol vs VXLAN →
21
444131%827Spanning Tree Protocol vs WebRTC →
22
RTPIETF
417123%997Spanning Tree Protocol vs RTP →
23
OSPFIETF
384113%921Spanning Tree Protocol vs OSPF →
24
EIGRPCisco
362107%871Spanning Tree Protocol vs EIGRP →
25
IPv4IETF
33298%801Spanning Tree Protocol vs IPv4 →
26
5G3GPP
30690%1,646Spanning Tree Protocol vs 5G →
27
29587%715Spanning Tree Protocol vs HTTP Live Streaming →
28
IPv6IETF
29487%689Spanning Tree Protocol vs IPv6 →
29
LTE3GPP
28985%1,121Spanning Tree Protocol vs LTE →
30
28183%673Spanning Tree Protocol vs IEEE 802.1X →
31
NTPIETF
26478%524Spanning Tree Protocol vs NTP →
32
NetFlowCisco
25976%599Spanning Tree Protocol vs NetFlow →
33
EVPNIETF
25074%913Spanning Tree Protocol vs EVPN →
34
RDMAIBTA
20962%1,140Spanning Tree Protocol vs RDMA →
35
19558%963Spanning Tree Protocol vs Precision Time Protocol →
36
AS2IETF
18655%370Spanning Tree Protocol vs AS2 →
37
18354%480Spanning Tree Protocol vs IEEE 802.11 →
38
18354%364Spanning Tree Protocol vs Remote Desktop Protocol →
39
RoCEInfiniBand Trade Association
18254%968Spanning Tree Protocol vs RoCE →
33,777 companies name a network protocol in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Spanning Tree Protocol users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 network protocols are named by companies instead of Spanning Tree Protocol: TCP/IP by 5,615 companies, DNS by 3,903, DHCP by 2,671, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/spanning-tree-protocol/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Spanning Tree Protocol alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Spanning Tree Protocol?

TCP/IP: 5,615 companies name it in their own job postings, against 339 for Spanning Tree Protocol.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on Spanning Tree Protocol
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market